Also acknowledge mixed-race couples with or without children. There are plenty of people in mixed-race marriages (Chris Rufo being the famous example; there are many others) who are redpilled, pro-white, or otherwise on our side, but are wary of speaking out for fear of the "racemixing" epithet. I don't believe racemixing should be promoted like it is, but I also don't think we should judge others in the romantic department either. Candace Owens and Michelle Malkin are welcome in my enclave.
I'm a big fan of both Candace and Michelle, but would opt for a neighborhood that's fully White.
Great thing about enclavism is that these sorts of questions no longer become crises to resolve, as people would be free to select the right approach for where they're at.
Let's assume that whites can retreat to their little enclaves and do white things. I assume Jews in their little enclaves will continue to do Jew things like promote open borders and miscegenation. Insulated from the worst of multiculturalism, whites will then cheerfully grill until the rising tide of color drowns them politically, culturally, and racially. Basically, this proposal is just a way to slow the white genocide boil so the frogs don't get jumpy. The only solution is the ethnostate.
This position would be more persuasive if we didn't have the vivid example of Orania as a locus for identity preservation and advocacy for the more ambitious separatist project moving forward down there.
Those people are probably doomed. So will we be, if we do not turn things around before the numbers are South Africa-bad. We won't win by defusing racial tensions.
Oranians have friendly and sensible relations with their non white neighbors, and having lots of kids who are proud of what they are, while the most prominent south african promoter of your strategy was murdered in his sleep.
I agree Matt..We need a realistic, logical, winning message that is easily understandable. One that doesn't scare ppl. Too many ppl want to start with totalitarianism & then 'Win Hearts & Minds'. There's a huge difference between promoting Diversity thru academia, media & Hollywood and with telling ppl who honestly support 95% of our visi
on that "We don't want your support because your ancestry.com data & social media dating history just doesn't match our standards".
People are coming to terms with the failure of post-racialism but I don’t think you realize how abhorrent a legal document that says e.g “no blacks allowed” is going to seem even to those who are open to some new thinking on Race.
Even this very limited, minimal, non-intrusive goal is one that would have an incredibly steep uphill battle. In practice, most would likely be crafted as private "civic organizations" that just happen to only be white, politely sidestepping the taboo you reference.
As always reasoned well, creating ethnic communities within states to preserve culture, language and traditions could be a viable opposition to the globalist world that the left wants. The problem is that the proponents of the woke ideology over the years have proven to be very undemocratic and dictatorial........ are not content to leave alone those who do not think as they do, they want to force everyone to think as they do.
What happens when a black person drives through this white enclave and needs gas? Are we going back to needing the Jim Crow-era "Negro Motorist Green Book"?
America is already riddled with no go zones where whites are unwelcome and the targets of low level harassment.
I oppose any sort of unfriendliness, and would expect non whites to be welcome as visitors and friends without qualifying to purchase or rent in the neighborhood in question.
Also acknowledge mixed-race couples with or without children. There are plenty of people in mixed-race marriages (Chris Rufo being the famous example; there are many others) who are redpilled, pro-white, or otherwise on our side, but are wary of speaking out for fear of the "racemixing" epithet. I don't believe racemixing should be promoted like it is, but I also don't think we should judge others in the romantic department either. Candace Owens and Michelle Malkin are welcome in my enclave.
I'm a big fan of both Candace and Michelle, but would opt for a neighborhood that's fully White.
Great thing about enclavism is that these sorts of questions no longer become crises to resolve, as people would be free to select the right approach for where they're at.
Let's assume that whites can retreat to their little enclaves and do white things. I assume Jews in their little enclaves will continue to do Jew things like promote open borders and miscegenation. Insulated from the worst of multiculturalism, whites will then cheerfully grill until the rising tide of color drowns them politically, culturally, and racially. Basically, this proposal is just a way to slow the white genocide boil so the frogs don't get jumpy. The only solution is the ethnostate.
This position would be more persuasive if we didn't have the vivid example of Orania as a locus for identity preservation and advocacy for the more ambitious separatist project moving forward down there.
Those people are probably doomed. So will we be, if we do not turn things around before the numbers are South Africa-bad. We won't win by defusing racial tensions.
Oranians have friendly and sensible relations with their non white neighbors, and having lots of kids who are proud of what they are, while the most prominent south african promoter of your strategy was murdered in his sleep.
I agree Matt..We need a realistic, logical, winning message that is easily understandable. One that doesn't scare ppl. Too many ppl want to start with totalitarianism & then 'Win Hearts & Minds'. There's a huge difference between promoting Diversity thru academia, media & Hollywood and with telling ppl who honestly support 95% of our visi
on that "We don't want your support because your ancestry.com data & social media dating history just doesn't match our standards".
People are coming to terms with the failure of post-racialism but I don’t think you realize how abhorrent a legal document that says e.g “no blacks allowed” is going to seem even to those who are open to some new thinking on Race.
That's almost kinda my point, though.
Even this very limited, minimal, non-intrusive goal is one that would have an incredibly steep uphill battle. In practice, most would likely be crafted as private "civic organizations" that just happen to only be white, politely sidestepping the taboo you reference.
As always reasoned well, creating ethnic communities within states to preserve culture, language and traditions could be a viable opposition to the globalist world that the left wants. The problem is that the proponents of the woke ideology over the years have proven to be very undemocratic and dictatorial........ are not content to leave alone those who do not think as they do, they want to force everyone to think as they do.
What happens when a black person drives through this white enclave and needs gas? Are we going back to needing the Jim Crow-era "Negro Motorist Green Book"?
America is already riddled with no go zones where whites are unwelcome and the targets of low level harassment.
I oppose any sort of unfriendliness, and would expect non whites to be welcome as visitors and friends without qualifying to purchase or rent in the neighborhood in question.