Why do you call everything White Supremacy now? Isn't America clearly (now and historically) a plutocracy? I think you drank too much of Columbian Cornpop's Kool-Aid
It's even worse than you suspect, as I talked him out of white supremacy, which led to his resolving his identity crisis where he was pretending to be white. Shame that he became anti-white, but I'm glad he's at home in the skin he's in. Odd situation.
Can you explain why you call everything White Supremacy though? You even blamed the black dick size trope on WS when that clearly comes from jewish porn, and blacks themselves perpetuate that trope in their movies like Soul Plane. Clearly America is not a system of White Supremacy, but a plutocracy. It was when you were associating with Cornpop that you started to call everything WS like a progressive.
1. I don't believe I've ever analyzed black dicks. Could you refresh my memory on when and where that alleged conversation took place?
2. My position on this has never changed, nor has my emphasis. Here's an article from over a decade ago in which I'm clearly stating what you falsely allege cornpop talked me into saying.
Jan 2, 2021 On your @urbanartshop twitter account, you wrote: "When liberal white women try to insult "racists," they can't help but lean on white supremacist pornography tropes contrived to sexually objectify black bodies"
This article *helps* to de-mystify what you mean by White Supremacy at least a little. But the article also mentions that you can't win by playing the enemy's game. Well, here you are using the enemy's term. You meaning it in a different sense is ineffective and confusing. I think you mean it in the sense Hunter wrote about in his recent article "Secular Talk: 61% of GOP believes in Great Replacement Theory" which is that White liberals try to control non-Whites as a voting block to maintain power via the democrat party. This is not the same definition that everyone else in the world has for White Supremacy, which is generally equated with the KKK, slavery, and colonialism.
You also still haven't addressed my challenge to your claim that America is a system of White Supremacy. It is not a system of White Supremacy but of capital supremacy. If the masonic mercantile elite would have made more money without slavery, slavery would have been banned. Slavery was about money, not simply trying to flex on blacks for their inferiority.
The Klan marched on DC 100 years ago in numbers above 30k and this was still 50 years after the klan act was passed. They still were not in charge at the time, nor are they now. Every American institution is blatantly anti-White. Obviously not a system of White supremacy.
I've explained very carefully what I mean by "white supremacy," which is the conviction that whites are generally superior to non-whites. This is the intuitive definition, what laymen mean when they say it; even if it's not what leftist academics mean when they say it.
I believe it's easier to simply accept that common definition and explain how it's become white saviorism while still remaining in place in the neoliberal order rather than engaging in what appears to be tedious word games to the casual observer.
We haven't the aptitude, inclination, nor platforms to engage in orwellian manipulation of language in the way our opponents do. And we're at our strongest when we reject that approach in favor of plain speech: "it's okay to be white." "reverse racism." "anti-white."
It's my opinion that White Supremacy is wrong. The majority of persuadables understand what White Supremacy is and believe that it's wrong. I believe we would be best served by explaining how the system is the white saviorist subtype of white supremacist rather than trying to get people to somehow deconstruct the single greatest taboo in our society -- one I actually also personally agree with in a limited manner.
Dude, what happened to your podcast? I know DLive is dead but odyssey is great and you and hunter wallace were a great combo. Really liked your takes. Also you’d be great on Tim Murdocks white rabbit radio. Miss your insights.
Both the 1.0 and 2.0 of the TradWorker guide explicitly dismissed that position. If he did say something to that effect, then he didn't say it in an official capacity. Also, I'm pretty sure he's moved on from that position. Most importantly, he is not me.
“Twp was by no means extremist as it’s official policy was not to kill the Jews and any statements made by our then leader to the effect that one should kill Jews were made purely in his personal capacity” - is that supposed to put anyone’s mind at ease?
I don't recall the supposed remarks, so it's the best I can do.
People can hold me accountable through guilt by association with the statements of any number of prominent people I've worked with over the decades. It's too many people who may or may not have said something I disagree with at some point. I am telling you now, as I've stated from the beginning, that I flatly oppose ethnic cleansing and always have.
If you're interested in my position on the JQ, it has evolved very little from where it was when I penned this essay in 2009...
Is it guilt by association? We are not talking about somebody you crossed paths with here and there. He was your closest collaborator for years, by your own choice. You would have known exactly what he thought about Jews and even if you don’t recall the precise quotes I’m referring to I don’t hear you denying he favored violence against, and even extermination of, Jews.
I believe you that you didn’t personally favor that but one who puts literal genocide in the “something I disagree with that need not interfere with close collaboration” category cannot claim to be a totally harmless advocate for beleaguered downscale whites.
I genuinely admire much of your writing (including the article you posted) so please tell me where I’m wrong here.
The relationship was complicated, to put it lightly, and his private and public position on that and other issues changed a lot over the years.
I don't recall him saying that and would be a bit surprised if he actually said that, but I know better than to flat out assume he didn't say something toxic and transgressive at some point.
Had I genuinely believed at any point that he was a genuine threat to anybody other than himself, I would have concluded my work with him sooner. I worked with him for about five years and it's been about five years, and I don't believe my work could or should be defined by him.
Why do you think that leftists and liberals ALWAYS end up with the pimp hand in every single avenue of society?
Alex Linder believes that Christian doctrine has weakened the white man and made our nations susceptible to defeat. Still others believe in the Ted Kaczynski model: that technology itself is our ultimate undoing.
I've dwelled a lot on this subject because it's fascinatingly predictable in our time. I can't really accept that it's Christ or kitchen appliances that causes liberals to become dominant in all institutions & I've always wondered what you think might cause this trend in our countries. THANKS.
We must learn to compete collectively in the information war. Chinese people and Jews Hindi convenience store owners are aware of the information war. This is because being a merchant and finding where to buy low and where to sell high is all about quality of information.
A shortcut to becoming an information warrior is to study calculus and physics and statistics. Mathematics gives you a rocket booster in the information war. It makes you better at whatever you're doing for a job or a business. Mathematics and physics is the universal job skill.
To look for an example of someone who lives like this behold the Chinese at the technical universities MIT Caltech and the like. I've met some people like this and they are way ahead on the information curve.
To win we must become better men stronger men. In the idiocracy it gets easier and easier to be the best and the strongest because few strive.
Why do you call everything White Supremacy now? Isn't America clearly (now and historically) a plutocracy? I think you drank too much of Columbian Cornpop's Kool-Aid
It's even worse than you suspect, as I talked him out of white supremacy, which led to his resolving his identity crisis where he was pretending to be white. Shame that he became anti-white, but I'm glad he's at home in the skin he's in. Odd situation.
Can you explain why you call everything White Supremacy though? You even blamed the black dick size trope on WS when that clearly comes from jewish porn, and blacks themselves perpetuate that trope in their movies like Soul Plane. Clearly America is not a system of White Supremacy, but a plutocracy. It was when you were associating with Cornpop that you started to call everything WS like a progressive.
1. I don't believe I've ever analyzed black dicks. Could you refresh my memory on when and where that alleged conversation took place?
2. My position on this has never changed, nor has my emphasis. Here's an article from over a decade ago in which I'm clearly stating what you falsely allege cornpop talked me into saying.
https://occidentaldissent.com/2010/07/21/picking-on-the-racially-handicapped/
Jan 2, 2021 On your @urbanartshop twitter account, you wrote: "When liberal white women try to insult "racists," they can't help but lean on white supremacist pornography tropes contrived to sexually objectify black bodies"
It was a facetious response to a woman asserting that racists have small wieners. I believe you read too much into that.
This article *helps* to de-mystify what you mean by White Supremacy at least a little. But the article also mentions that you can't win by playing the enemy's game. Well, here you are using the enemy's term. You meaning it in a different sense is ineffective and confusing. I think you mean it in the sense Hunter wrote about in his recent article "Secular Talk: 61% of GOP believes in Great Replacement Theory" which is that White liberals try to control non-Whites as a voting block to maintain power via the democrat party. This is not the same definition that everyone else in the world has for White Supremacy, which is generally equated with the KKK, slavery, and colonialism.
You also still haven't addressed my challenge to your claim that America is a system of White Supremacy. It is not a system of White Supremacy but of capital supremacy. If the masonic mercantile elite would have made more money without slavery, slavery would have been banned. Slavery was about money, not simply trying to flex on blacks for their inferiority.
The Klan marched on DC 100 years ago in numbers above 30k and this was still 50 years after the klan act was passed. They still were not in charge at the time, nor are they now. Every American institution is blatantly anti-White. Obviously not a system of White supremacy.
I've explained very carefully what I mean by "white supremacy," which is the conviction that whites are generally superior to non-whites. This is the intuitive definition, what laymen mean when they say it; even if it's not what leftist academics mean when they say it.
I believe it's easier to simply accept that common definition and explain how it's become white saviorism while still remaining in place in the neoliberal order rather than engaging in what appears to be tedious word games to the casual observer.
We haven't the aptitude, inclination, nor platforms to engage in orwellian manipulation of language in the way our opponents do. And we're at our strongest when we reject that approach in favor of plain speech: "it's okay to be white." "reverse racism." "anti-white."
It's my opinion that White Supremacy is wrong. The majority of persuadables understand what White Supremacy is and believe that it's wrong. I believe we would be best served by explaining how the system is the white saviorist subtype of white supremacist rather than trying to get people to somehow deconstruct the single greatest taboo in our society -- one I actually also personally agree with in a limited manner.
Dude, what happened to your podcast? I know DLive is dead but odyssey is great and you and hunter wallace were a great combo. Really liked your takes. Also you’d be great on Tim Murdocks white rabbit radio. Miss your insights.
I have a lot of distractions in my private and professional life that preclude streaming for now.
I do hope to get back at it, but want to be relatively confident that I can be relatively consistent with it when I do it.
What about those quotes from the other person most associated with twp that advocate exterminationism of a certain group?
Both the 1.0 and 2.0 of the TradWorker guide explicitly dismissed that position. If he did say something to that effect, then he didn't say it in an official capacity. Also, I'm pretty sure he's moved on from that position. Most importantly, he is not me.
“Twp was by no means extremist as it’s official policy was not to kill the Jews and any statements made by our then leader to the effect that one should kill Jews were made purely in his personal capacity” - is that supposed to put anyone’s mind at ease?
I don't recall the supposed remarks, so it's the best I can do.
People can hold me accountable through guilt by association with the statements of any number of prominent people I've worked with over the decades. It's too many people who may or may not have said something I disagree with at some point. I am telling you now, as I've stated from the beginning, that I flatly oppose ethnic cleansing and always have.
If you're interested in my position on the JQ, it has evolved very little from where it was when I penned this essay in 2009...
https://occidentaldissent.com/2009/12/14/the-jewish-question/
Is it guilt by association? We are not talking about somebody you crossed paths with here and there. He was your closest collaborator for years, by your own choice. You would have known exactly what he thought about Jews and even if you don’t recall the precise quotes I’m referring to I don’t hear you denying he favored violence against, and even extermination of, Jews.
I believe you that you didn’t personally favor that but one who puts literal genocide in the “something I disagree with that need not interfere with close collaboration” category cannot claim to be a totally harmless advocate for beleaguered downscale whites.
I genuinely admire much of your writing (including the article you posted) so please tell me where I’m wrong here.
The relationship was complicated, to put it lightly, and his private and public position on that and other issues changed a lot over the years.
I don't recall him saying that and would be a bit surprised if he actually said that, but I know better than to flat out assume he didn't say something toxic and transgressive at some point.
Had I genuinely believed at any point that he was a genuine threat to anybody other than himself, I would have concluded my work with him sooner. I worked with him for about five years and it's been about five years, and I don't believe my work could or should be defined by him.
Why do you think that leftists and liberals ALWAYS end up with the pimp hand in every single avenue of society?
Alex Linder believes that Christian doctrine has weakened the white man and made our nations susceptible to defeat. Still others believe in the Ted Kaczynski model: that technology itself is our ultimate undoing.
I've dwelled a lot on this subject because it's fascinatingly predictable in our time. I can't really accept that it's Christ or kitchen appliances that causes liberals to become dominant in all institutions & I've always wondered what you think might cause this trend in our countries. THANKS.
https://birdman.substack.com/p/intro
We must learn to compete collectively in the information war. Chinese people and Jews Hindi convenience store owners are aware of the information war. This is because being a merchant and finding where to buy low and where to sell high is all about quality of information.
A shortcut to becoming an information warrior is to study calculus and physics and statistics. Mathematics gives you a rocket booster in the information war. It makes you better at whatever you're doing for a job or a business. Mathematics and physics is the universal job skill.
To look for an example of someone who lives like this behold the Chinese at the technical universities MIT Caltech and the like. I've met some people like this and they are way ahead on the information curve.
To win we must become better men stronger men. In the idiocracy it gets easier and easier to be the best and the strongest because few strive.
This mentions you:
http://alog6.substack.com/p/greg-johnson-speaks-about-matt-parrott