14 Comments

I know all the arguments over civic nationalism, race-mixing, convincing normies, Christianity, and the JQ. These will be settled in one way or another, over time. Or never settled at all. I am not perfect, and politicians are never perfect. But if Vance and like-minded people get in and direct policy this time around, this will be a very good thing for the future.

Expand full comment

they will of course be settled. you can go check the census. european-Americans are 41% of the population. the "White" population counting White hispanics, arabs, north africans, turks, iranians, armenian, many central asians, is "56%". theres intense pressure to race mix. you can go look at ANY given zoomer age 20-something girl's facebook to see that in action. the future is Brazil. "White" being the light skinned negroids. continuing to vote trump is definitely part of what has led to that being a freaking certainty at this point.

Expand full comment
Nov 3Edited

First of all, glad to hear from you again after months of silence.........I agree, Harris represents the queen of woke, the once who wants white people destroyed, their culture destroyed and suppress liberties. So a vote for Trump it's a vote not for the perfect president but surely for the better president or the lesser of two evils.

P.s Sir, be free to answer if you want, How's Heimbach? According to you he will vote for Trump?

Expand full comment

we've been doing lesser of two evils for 79 years. where has it got us ? further from the promised land, less White, less moral, less income, less jobs, more migrants, more uppity blacks, more gay. if you want change you have to change something

Expand full comment

Everything is necessarily the lesser of two evils, as no candidate is going to be exactly aligned with me. I do not make that argument and recommended against voting in 2020, 2012, and even 2008.

Expand full comment
Nov 3Edited

murica, in a certain way i understand what you mean..........lesser of two evils many times in history has meant bad politics. But we have to understand that in this case we have a strongly anti white and woke candidate (Harris) that is dangerous if got power. The other is not perfect, is not morally correct and exemplary but is still not woke and not explicitly anti white. Kamala instead represents the stereotype of leftist antifa, woke, neoliberal that we have always fought.

Expand full comment

He's doing very well, just busy with his private life business. I'll pass along your regards.

Expand full comment
User was indefinitely suspended for this comment. Show
Expand full comment

I have heard this same argument, every election, my entire life. just this one time bro, please. but everything is getting worse. the GOP is heading away from what we achieved in 2016, not towards it. Vance wrote a book about how much he hates White people, and said in it he married an indian Wife because "White people are losers". His emails to his tranny best friend that got leaked are the same, "I hate them", "theyre all racist animals". Im not fucking doing it. its explicit White identity or nothing, no more compromise. run Steve king if you want my vote.

Expand full comment

Vance has certainly "evolved," but he and his broligarch team represent a genuinely novel opportunity to transform the GOP in a national populist direction.

Expand full comment

I'm cool with whatever happens. I sure hope you are right about Trump and the broligarchs. If the boot lightens upon our necks, the Tocqueville Effect will be activated.

If the Democrats steal it or do some extreme measure to remain in power, that's actually good too. Everybody will be saying "Trump would have saved us". The normies will be radicalized by "what could have been ".

Meanwhile, the BRICS is replacing the dollar with the Unit, the USA goes into hyperinflation, the welfare class and patronage class gets paid in dollars with very weak purchasing power. Weimar on crack, steroids and angel dust. And democrats and cat lady liberals and you know who else gets the blame.

"Conceive you this folly, Ossipon? The weak! The source of all evil on this earth!" he continued with his grim assurance. "I told him that I dreamt of a world like shambles, where the weak would be taken in hand for utter extermination.

"Do you understand, Ossipon? The source of all evil! They are our sinister masters--the weak, the flabby, the silly, the cowardly, the faint of heart, and the slavish of mind. They have power. They are the multitude. Theirs is the kingdom of the earth. Exterminate, exterminate! That is the only way of progress. It is! Follow me, Ossipon. First the great multitude of the weak must go, then the only relatively strong. You see? First the blind, then the deaf and the dumb, then the halt and the lame--and so on. Every taint, every vice, every prejudice, every convention must meet its doom."

"And what remains?" asked Ossipon in a stifled voice.

"I remain--if I am strong enough," asserted the sallow little Professor, whose large ears, thin like membranes, and standing far out from the sides of his frail skull, took on suddenly a deep red tint.

"Haven't I suffered enough from this oppression of the weak?

Expand full comment

“Oppression of the weak”

There’s an oxymoron for you! That’s up there with chaste promiscuity!

Expand full comment

You're not organizing anything to move right and won't ever do that. If you wanted to, you would. People are dying for their countries even in Europe, even today, and their countries suck. Americans are too well fed and intoxicated to do anything.

Nobody trusts you. Nobody trusts these endless switches, desperately trying to find some celebrity politician like Tulsi and Vivek to attach to.

All you'll get is no changes and the American Empire's managed decay. Trump or Kamala is completely irrelevant. Can't wait to see the complete meltdown, regardless of who wins.

Expand full comment

There haven't been endless switches. There's been a simple "faith, family, and folk" heuristic which lands on different people at different times because people and things change in politics.

Expand full comment